sample report

See what a Merchant Center audit report looks like.

This is an anonymised sample generated by the internal Useful Patch audit workflow. Real reports vary by intake, screenshots, product examples, and feed details.

£29 quick triageStart the £199 audit
Sample only. Useful Patch does not guarantee approval or reinstatement, and does not invent product identifiers or compliance evidence.

Useful Patch Merchant Center Audit Draft: example-shop-test


Important boundary

This is an audit draft, not a guarantee of approval or reinstatement. Google decides review outcomes. The goal is to identify likely issue patterns, safe next steps, and changes that should not be guessed.


Intake summary

  • Store URL: example-shop.test
  • Reported issue: Google Merchant Center suspended for misrepresentation. Google support sends copy-paste replies and says the site is still non-compliant.
  • Product examples: example-shop.test/products/red-widget, example-shop.test/products/blue-widget
  • Feed URL/export: not supplied
  • Already tried: Updated returns page, added contact form, requested review twice.
  • Extra notes: Shopify store. Owner thinks everything is compliant but Google will not specify the remaining issue.

  • Triage classification

  • Labels: misrepresentation, suspension
  • Draft confidence: medium
  • Blockers / missing evidence:
  • - Policy/account-level issue needs sanity review before customer delivery


    Ranked audit checks

    1. Review readiness and evidence trail

  • There is a clear change log before requesting another Google review.
  • Screenshots and examples exist for the main fixes made.
  • The next review request should reference specific changes, not vague compliance claims.
  • If the account is still inconsistent, delay review rather than burning another attempt.

  • 2. Trust, identity, and policy consistency

  • Business/contact details are visible, consistent, and plausible across the site.
  • Returns, shipping, privacy, and terms pages are present and easy to find.
  • Checkout path does not introduce surprise costs, hidden terms, or broken trust signals.
  • Product claims are supportable and do not look exaggerated or unsupported.

  • Evidence to request before final delivery

  • Merchant Center diagnostics screenshot showing the issue text and affected products.
  • 3-5 affected product URLs or SKUs.
  • Feed URL/export if available.
  • Screenshot or notes showing what was changed before the last review request.
  • Contact, returns, shipping, privacy, and terms page URLs where relevant.

  • Do not do

  • Do not invent GTINs, MPNs, brands, or compliance evidence.
  • Do not rewrite medical, financial, safety, or regulated claims without proof.
  • Do not request another review just because a page exists; request only after material cleanup.
  • Do not bulk-edit live product data until the repeated issue pattern is clear.

  • Recommended next step

    Do a manual sanity review of trust/policy evidence before sending the customer-facing report. Do not rush another review request until account-level consistency has been checked.


    Commercial fit

    Likely fit for audit plus possible done-for-you rescue if the store has clear evidence and fixable consistency gaps. Monitoring may fit after cleanup.